Star Wars Week: Forget Stars Wars aliens – here’s where we might find the real ones

Page 1

Main image: Does looking for life mean finding another Earth? Image credit: Nasa/Ames/JPL-Caltech

For now, the aliens of Star Wars are pure sci-fi, but if there is life on other worlds, we already know where to look. It’s only been 20 years since the discovery of 51 Pegasi b, the first-ever exoplanet to be detected – and the first of thousands. Thanks to the Hubble, Spitzer and especially the Kepler Space telescopes, astronomers have hunted down over 4,000 planets orbiting other stars, some of which are Earth-sized, and in the habitable zone of a Sun-like star.

Could they support life? Back in the 1960s, astronomer Frank Drake created an equation to predict the likelihood of alien life, and figured there were at least 10,000 communicating civilizations in our galaxy alone. Given that there are 400 billion stars and at least 100 billion planets in the Milky Way, Drake’s estimate is a conservative one if – and it’s a big if – life exists at all beyond Planet Earth.

However, do we have to go light years away to find life? Find alien lifeforms on any of the seven other planets or 175 moons of the Solar System, and the conclusion will be simple: life is everywhere. We have no evidence to prove that we’re alone or we’re not, but either conclusion is profound. All we have is tantalising glimpses, clues and a vast bucket list of places we suspect aliens could exist.

Tabby’s Star – an alien megastructure?

SETI Allen Telescope Array

Did the Kepler Space telescope find an advanced alien megastructure hanging out in front of a star? The chances are slim, of course, but there’s definitely something weird going on in the Tabby star system (officially called KIC 8462852), which periodically dimmed by 20% and more between 2009 and 2013. That’s a helluva lot, which has got folks talking about the possibility of an astro-engineering megastructure, such as a Dyson Sphere of solar panels.

Or it could be that an alien society is trying to announce itself. If so, it’s working – the SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) Institute has trained its Allen Telescope Array on Tabby’s Star to study radio signals. “It’s quite likely that this star’s strange behaviour is due to nature, not aliens, (but) it’s only prudent to check such things out,” says SETI Institute astronomer Seth Shostak.

Kepler 3b: clear skies and water vapour

Kepler 3b

Astronomers are currently using data from three of Nasa’s space telescopes – Hubble, Spitzer and Kepler – in their search for Earth-sized planets. Mostly they find ‘hot Jupiters’ far bigger than Earth, but what about a ‘hot Neptune’? About five times the radius of Earth and 122 light years from Earth, Kepler 3b orbits a star called HAT-P-11b (nice work, naming convention committee).

Having originally found it in 2009, NASA had another look last year and discovered that Kepler 3b has a cloud-free atmosphere and, rather stunningly, water vapour. Detecting the latter is highly unusual, so Kepler 3b has to go on the list; where there’s water, there’s life … probably.

The unexplained Wow! signal

SETI 'Wow' signal

Is it possible that we found aliens back in 1977? While working for SETI at the Big Ear radiotelescope in Delaware, Ohio, astronomer Jerry R. Ehman detected an unexpectedly strong narrowband radio signal from within the constellation of Sagittarius which lasted for 37 seconds, prompting him to write “Wow!’ in the data sheet’s margin. Then nothing happened – no source for the signal was ever found. Was it an artificially generated radio signal sent by alien civilisation? Or was it simply something from Earth that bounced off space debris?

Gliese 876 – Super-Earths

Gliese 876 system

Since interstellar travel is impossible, the search for alien life must prioritise close exoplanets that could support life – and Gliese 876 has got to be on the shortlist. ‘Just’ 15.2 light years away in the direction of the constellation of Aquarius, this red dwarf star has the four confirmed closest exoplanets to us: Gliese 876 b, Gliese 876 c, Gliese 876 d and Gliese 876 e.

All are larger than Earth, and orbit their star from about the distance of Mercury, and there’s little reason to avoid such Super-Earths if you’re serious about alien-hunting, since they appear to be by far the most numerous exoplanets (about 77% of all exoplanets found in the Milky Way so far, although they are easier to find than Earth-sized planets). Besides, planets that size – about six times bigger than Earth – could have habitable moons, which for all we know are the dominant home of extraterrestrial life in the Milky Way.

Enceladus and Titan – the Moon rivers

Saturn's moon Enceladus

So why not try out the moons theory? Back in 2013 the orbiting Cassini spacecraft confirmed that Saturn’s tiny icy moon, Enceladus, has an underground sea of liquid water. The news has excited scientists because the plumes of ice and water vapour, which were first discovered jetting from fractures at the moon’s south pole in 2005, have been revealed to be warm and salty – both are tell-tale signs that there’s more water below the surface.

Another moon of Saturn, Titan, is the only other body aside from Earth to have confirmed standing liquid on its surface. There’s just one problem: that liquid is ethane and methane, not water. If Titan’s seas of liquid methane do contain organisms it would completely change scientific concepts of how life can evolve – and the search parameters would dramatically widen.

READ  Updated: iPhone 6C release date, news and rumors

Page 2

Kepler-452b – a Second Earth?


The search for life is all about the ‘Goldilocks zone’. Find a planet that’s a similar distance from its star as Earth is from the Sun, the theory goes, and it may also have water pooling on its surface. Okay, so that definition may appear to lack imagination and any kind on confidence in the possible variety of alien biology, but we can only go on what we know: life develops in warm, wet conditions.

From the more than 4,000 exoplanets already discovered, only 12 are about the same size as Earth and in the Goldilocks zone, the chief suspect for life being Kepler-452b, the smallest such planet so far discovered. Around 1400 light-years from us, Kepler-452b has a similar distance from and length of orbit around its star, Kepler-452, which is 1.5 billion years older than our Sun. If you’re talking about a Second Earth, for now, that means Kepler-452b.

Mars – Panspermia

Artist's impression of water on Mars

Is there life on Mars? It’s definitely got water. In September geologists found recurring slope lineae – long, dark, damp, salty streaks – on its highlands, evidence that saltwater still flows. The Curiosity rover has found dried-up rivers and pebbles that suggest flowing water, too, and astronomers thinks Mars used to be a lot warmer, and have a much thicker atmosphere, and even oceans.

It’s prompted some to theorise that Mars could even be the source of simple microbial life in the Solar System, which came to Earth on meteorites in a process called Panspermia. It’s possible – plenty of Martian meteorites have been found on Earth. This is why NASA is so obsessed with Mars.

Mars – forward contamination


There is life on Mars – we put it there. Panspermia works both ways. If Earth is the only source of life – or the only present home of life – then NASA has already accidentally transported extremophile organisms (back?) to Mars on its rovers including Spirit, Opportunity, Viking and Curiosity – the latter of which is banned from going anywhere near water courses.

Maybe the damage is already done – might Mars one day turn green because of our accidental forward contamination? Putting a man on Mars suddenly has serious consequences. From a scientific point of view, there would be no point in ever going back – all you would find would be evidence of Earth-based lifeforms.

However, forward contamination could well be a natural feature of existence in a galaxy. It’s also possible that our Solar System both leaves behind a trail of, and busts through a mess of, organic materials and microbes as it moves through its orbit of the centre of the Milky Way, which it does at 828,000 kmh, completing a Galactic Year every 250 million years.

Europa – an ocean under ice

Jupiter's moon Europa

Europa, the second-closest moon to Jupiter and a bit smaller than our Moon, rocketed up Nasa’s to-do list in December 2013 when the Hubble Space Telescope detected water vapour above its south pole. The plumes suggest there’s a liquid water ocean on Europa, beneath an icy crust that could be as much as 100km thick. It’s suspected that there’s more water there than on Earth, but as yet there’s no proof.

Europa is considered to be one of the best places to look for extraterrestrial life – it even has both traces of sulphur and an infrared signal similar to that given off by bacteria. Sending a spacecraft to drill into the ice to sample the water for microbial life is impossible with current technology, but since the water vapour is being vented into space it would be possible for an orbiting spacecraft to sample material from deep within the moon without having to drill down into it. Nasa will send a flagship mission to Europa in the mid-2020s.

Kepler-186f – Earth-sized and orbiting an M dwarf star


Go with what you know. The first validated Earth-size planet to orbit a distant star in the habitable zone, exoplanet Kepler-186f, is part of a five-planet star system about 500 light-years from Earth in the constellation of Cygnus. However, Kepler-186f orbits a much smaller star than our Sun, an M dwarf, and in just 130 days. As it does, it receives only a third of the energy the Earth gets; the brightness of its star at high noon is only as bright as our Sun appears about an hour before sunset.

Not ideal? On the contrary… “M dwarfs are the most numerous stars,” says Elisa Quintana, research scientist at the SETI Institute at Nasa’s Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, California. “The first signs of other life in the galaxy may well come from planets orbiting an M dwarf.”

There are no comments yet

× You need to log in to enter the discussion